The recent release of several political and security prisoners has been met with enthusiasm by many South Sudanese, who see it as a hopeful step toward national reconciliation, building trust, and reinforcing peace. These actions highlight the significance of dialogue, unity, and upholding the rule of law during this pivotal time in our nation’s journey.
Yet, the ongoing detention of Dr. Isaiah Akol Mathiang brings to light crucial issues surrounding the principles of natural justice, equality before the law, and fairness in how justice is administered.
The Transitional Constitution of the Republic of South Sudan acknowledges essential rights and freedoms, including the right to liberty, due process, and equal protection under the law. These principles demand that every citizen is treated justly and without bias, no matter their political ties, social standing, or public profile.
Natural justice is built on the belief that no one should face arbitrary treatment and that legal processes must be applied uniformly. When individuals in similar situations have been released, it’s only natural for the public to question whether the same legal standards are being upheld for those who are still detained.
This isn’t about political allegiance. It’s a call rooted in the principles of justice and fairness that are the bedrock of any democratic and constitutional framework. If there’s enough evidence against someone, the law should proceed through clear and open judicial processes. Conversely, if the evidence is lacking, ongoing detention raises valid concerns about due process and equal treatment.
BARGHEL MEDIA wants to make it clear that we are not affiliated with SPLM-IO or any other opposition group. Our stance is rooted in principles rather than political ties. We stand for justice, accountability, good governance, and the rule of law for every South Sudanese citizen.
We also appreciate the significant role the SPLM has played in the liberation and development of South Sudan, and we recognize the efforts of the SPLM-led government in fostering national stability and implementing public policies. However, supporting the government's principles and policies should never stop citizens from voicing legitimate concerns about justice and fairness when those issues arise.
The recent release of notable prisoners show that the government can exercise discretion for the sake of peace, reconciliation, and national unity. Therefore, it’s only fair to call for a review of Dr. Isaiah Akol Mathiang's case with the same sense of fairness and impartiality.
In the end, justice must not only be served but also be perceived as being served. Treating everyone equally under the law boosts public trust in state institutions, fosters national unity, and upholds the constitutional values that the Republic of South Sudan is built upon.
For these reasons, Dr. Isaiah Akol Mathiang's case warrants urgent attention from the relevant authorities, in line with the Constitution, South Sudan's laws, and the universally accepted principles of justice, fairness, and due proces
